Popular Articles

generic levitra
India Eco Summit: Strengthening public transport
Mihir Mishra / New Delhi November 11, 2009, 0:30 IST

payday loans canada
Govt not to roll back incentives given to exporters: Sharma
The government today ruled out any possibility of rolling back the incentives given to the export sector saying the country has yet to fully recover from the impact of the global financial meltdown.

News of the day

Fortis gains on Rs 250cr investment plans
The stock soared to a high of Rs 136 and finally ended at Rs 134, up 4% from its previous close. The counter clocked volumes of 1.75 million shares as compared to the two-week daily average traded volumes of 466,405 shares on the BSE. ______________________________________________________
Online Business

SC notice to Trai, RCom, Tata Tele, Vodafone others

The Supreme Court has issued notice to 11 parties, including Trai, Reliance Communications, Tata Teleservices, Vodafone Essar, on a petition by state-run BSNL challenging removal of Access Deficit Charge (ADC), a levy paid by private telecom operators for funding the PSU"s operations in rural and remote areas. - India can"t handle high fiscal deficit for long: Mukherjee - A tale of two firms - Trai"ing times - Posco Foundation formed - Starbucks"s Schultz pushes instant coffee - A V Rajwade: Managing G3 currencies">A V Rajwade: Managing G3 currencies A Bench headed by Justice Altamas Kabir sought an reply from 11 repondents Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India, Reliance Communications, Tata Teleservices, Vodafone Essar Mobile Services, Cellular Operators Association of India, Bharti Airtel, Idea Cellular, BPL Mobile Communications, HFCL Infotel, and Spice Communications -- as to why they should not pay ADC to BSNL. The Bench also directed that payments, if any, shall be made during the pendency of the petition and the same shall be subject to final outcome of the hearing. Access Deficit Charge was a levy paid by private telecom operators to BSNL for meeting the cost of unprofitable operations in rural areas for below the cost wire line and mobile services. The telecom regulator had abolished ADC in 2008-09. In the two fiscals previous to that, the ADC was reduced. In 2007-08, the regulator had reduced ADC by 37 per cent to Rs 2,000 crore from Rs 3,200 crore. Challenging the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal"s (TDSAT) judgement that held that BSNL had no legal right to claim ADC from private telecom operators and Trai had rightly terminated it, BSNL said the entire exercise undertaken by the regulator was not only arbitary and irrational but also contrary to the principles of level-playing field.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):